Saturday, May 24, 2008

Reader Beware!

**Disclaimer! This post is my political rant of the week. I'm going to lay out my disdain for Barack Obama and the "left" in general. So you know, read at your own risk. And as a qualifier, I don't hate people that are liberal, I just don't agree at all with their political belief system. I happen to have many liberal friends that I admire and associate with on a regular basis. However, this topic causes me to verbalize myself in a hateful manner. Just don't take it personally.**

Fortunately, since I'm not the greatest at expressing my thoughts and ideas, I've found other people who can get the point across a lot quicker than I can.

Thomas Sowell
"No doubt it is only a matter of time before there is a black president...The issue is whether we want to reach that landmark so badly that we are willing to overlook how questionably that landmark is reached."

Some people, such as John Kerry, are only voting for Obama strictly because he is black (but remember how he is technically only half black?)

Good reasoning, Senator!

Barack the Communist

Obama wants to give us free health care, benefits up the ying yang, lower gas, free school, free food, hope, change, passion, etc. He's so very moving, you know.

Thomas Jefferson once said, "the government that has the power to give you everything you want also has the power to take everything you have from you."

But you know, good ole' Barack only cares about the safety and well-being of everyone. He wants everyone to be happy and flourish! And when he talks, you know, don't you get that tingling feeling in your leg? Last week in Portland, Barack attracted the largest crowd he's ever drawn. All to say this:

"We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times and then just expect that other countries are going to say OK."

Wait, since when do I care what other countries think? Since when does America start taking orders from "other countries." Was it sometime after no one helped us with Katrina, or before we gave millions of dollars in food and aid to all the other foreign natural disasters in a time of war (a war in which few countries are helping us with.) And speaking of that war, why do we have to follow UN regs anyways? Did you know our soldiers can't shoot unless their being shot upon? Look at what that's costing us.

And people complain that the Patriot Act (it's stopped a few major terror threats since it's been enacted) and FICA (let's the CIA, without a warrant, listen in on phone calls between foreign countries that are merely -routed- through the US) are unconstitutional. This is straight up liberty theft.

We're America, I think we deserve our liberty and our sovereignty, Mr. Obama.

Barack the Baby Killer

I know there are medical reasons for getting an abortion. In fact, there are 2 medical reasons for getting an abortion. One is a very rare condition in which the fetus (which by the way, means ’little child’ in Latin) grows outside of the womb, like in the falopian tube. Obviously the baby cannot grow or survive there. The body normally would do an -’auto’ abort, but the fetus would still have to be removed from the tube, so as not to mess up a woman’s reproductive organs. The second medical reason for an abortion is easier to predict, easier to identify, and easier to take care of. It basically entails the mother having extremely high blood pressure during pregnancy. Basically, unless it is taken care of in the first trimester, the mother is screwed. If she does a late abortion, or a partial birth abortion, she is just as much at risk as she would be if she just had a c-section.

So here’s the thing: while there are TWO reasons to have a 1st trimester abortion, there is NO REASON to have a 2nd or 3rd trimester abortion. If there is a ’malfunction’ in the productive stages of a pregnancy, your body will naturally cause you to have a miscarriage. This could potentially happen as late as the 2nd or 3rd trimester.

Now why am I so anti 2nd and 3rd Trimester abortion, you ask? Because it is literally murder. There is no if’s, and’s, or but’s about it. A common procedure performed at 8 months (mind you, many children are born healthy at 8 months) is being widely accepted these days, and it disgusts me. It’s called Incision D & E. The D and E stand for Dilation and Extraction. Look it up. You’re lazy, so I’ll tell you. The doctor dilates your cervix, which is a common thing to do, helps people birth faster, but instead of popping the baby out, they instead stick a knife up into the baby’s brain , scrape the brain out, and then vacuum the baby out into a garbage sack. Why is this legal? Hey, it’s the woman’s body, right? I mean, if she doesn’t want to be pregnant for another month, why should she, right? By the way, Obama is pro partial birth abortion, which uses exactly the means in which I just described. Oh, also, he voted against legislation that would allow doctors to try to save the life of a surviving child of a botched abortion.

Barack the Liar

Obama likes to twist words and flip flop his stance according to the latest research and polls, NOT from actual experience or anything.

For example:
"If Iran ever tried to pose a serious threat to us, they wouldn't stand a chance."

5 days later:
"Iran is a grave threat. It has an illicit nuclear program. It supports terrorism across the region and militias in Iraq. It threatens Israel's existence. It denies the Holocaust."

Funny, because just after that, President Bush said the following:

"Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: "Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided." We have an obligation to call this what it is -- the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history."

And now Obama is back to saying that talks really do work. But this isn't the only topic that Obama likes to twist.

On our Iraq timeline, McCain said we'd be there for:
"Maybe a hundred [years]. We've been in South Korea. We've been in Japan for 60 years. We've been in South Korea for 50 years or so. That'd be fine with me as long as Americans are not being injured or harmed or wounded or killed. Then it's fine with me."

Obama, spewing with "rank falsehood," then made several statements like this:

“[McCain] is basically running for a third Bush term. He wants to continue this war in Iraq maybe for another 100 years."

Obama 08--a new kind of politics!

Barack the friend

Via Daniel Flynn, I found Obama's lovely assortment of friends, advisers, and endorsers:

* Rabidly anti-Israel Columbia University professor Rashid Khalidi. The Obamas were regular dinner guests at Khalidi’s Hyde Park home for years.

* Terrorist sympathizer Ali Abunimah, who runs the viciously anti-Israel web site Electronic Intifada.

* Unrepentant Weather Underground terrorists William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn.

* Reverend Jeremiah Wright. What more needs to be said?

* Anti-Israel foreign policy adviser Samantha Power — fired after calling Hillary Clinton a “monster.”

* Anti-Israel foreign policy adviser Robert Malley — fired when it was revealed he has been holding talks with Hamas.

* Hatem El-Hady, former official of the Hamas-linked charity Kindhearts, closed by the Justice Department. El-Hady’s web page—with Michelle Obama listed as an opt-in “friend”—suddenly vanished from the Obama campaign site with no explanation, after being exposed by LGF and others.

Did I mention that not only does Obama support Hamas, but Hamas supports Obama!

Steve Gill:

"Well, on the very day President Bush arrived in Israel to mark the nation’s 60th anniversary and to renew his push for a Palestinian state as part of elusive Israeli-Palestinian peace process, Barack’s buddies fired a rocket into an Israeli shopping mall. The mall was devastated, and 14 innocent civilians were seriously injured.

The Hamas endorsement of Obama is even more interesting when viewed against the backdrop of the group’s aggressive promotion of violence among young Palestinians in Gaza and in the context of a recent Al-Jazeera story about how young Palestinians in Gaza have banded together to call American voters at random asking them to vote for Obama. Rockets by night, Obama phone banks by day?

The fact that receiving Hamas support does not appear to disturb Obama should worry us even more than the fact that terrorists see something in him that they really like.

Barack the Snob:

"You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, and like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing's replaced them. And they fell through the Clinton Administration, and the Bush Administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. And it's not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."

So remember kids, don't vote for Obama, or anyone on the left side of the aisle this November. If you still don't understand, you should probably not be voting.


Sexy Einstein said...

Well hello there Sassy. I don't know how I got to your blog, I may or may not be drunk surfing, which is as dangerous as drunk dialing… but I digress. I completely disagree with (almost) everything you have written here, but we're allowed to disagree, are we not?

A couple, or three, or more comments that crept out of my head as I read your post, I will be working form bottom to top, and here we go.

Barack--maybe a snob, I agree with you. I think that most people running for the highest office have to think they are better than the rest of us, Right Wing or Left Wing. I do think that Bush giving up, ahem lying about giving up golf in an attempt to feel some kind of false sense of solidarity with the families of dead soldiers is Uber snobby. We’ll call this one a draw.

Poor taste in referring to Hamas as Obama's buddies. It would be like me referring to The Bin Laden group as Bush's buddies since they had business dealing in the 80's and 90's. Or it would be like referring to Saddam as Bush's buddy since Rumsfeld did meet with him on occasion and since Republican super hero Reagan did supply him with arms and money during the 8 year Iraq- Iran war.

Bush doesn't really know what the word appeasement actually means, but I am hoping you do, which would make his speech in front of the Knesset a tad bit unclear.

Oh yeah and the whole Bush policy against meeting with terrorists doesn't hold much water. Before he met with Israel he met with the government of Saudi Arabia. The same Saudi Arabia that birthed 15 of the 19-- 9-11 hijackers. The same Saudi Arabia that birthed Bin Laden and made his company- The Bin Laden group millionaires many times over. Papa Bush's cabinet members also met with Saddam on a few occasions and Papa Bush along with Reagan supplied Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban with weapons and money during the Afghan war with Russia. Rumsfeld, the same Rumsfeld that helped to lead this nation into an unjust war did have a few sit downs with Saddam. Why is it so wrong to try to avoid war, when did the notion of peace become so loathsome.

Barack may be a liar, - What Politician isn't- but so is Bush and his mythical weapons of mass destruction fable.

Next time you use the heading
"Barack the Communist," try to explain what you mean. I am honestly willing to be taught, but your argument fell apart after the title due to lack of support. Good title though, it was really catchy.

I agree with you about Katrina victims receiving no help from foreign agencies, but it received almost as much help from American agencies, like the Bush White House or the Bush assembled organization known as FEMA.

Drop the race issue. His chances of success or failure really don't depend on his race, even though some may think so. If you really think that he is garnering his support because his blackness makes him a novelty, then you are a, hmmmmmm. I just stopped myself from calling you a whole bunch of mean names, like jerk or stink face.

By the way I am not a democrat or a republican, I am a constitutionalist, and I try to base my decisions around that wonderful document, the same document that George Bush called “Just a piece of paper.” I support the supporters of that document whether they are Republicans, Democrats, Whigs, Torries, Libertarians, etc.

Thanks, bye.

Sexy Einstein said...

I never said its ok because Bush did it. I am making the point that the issues you claim lie with the left actually lie with both parties. My point was to show the hypocrisy in your argument. The negatives you claim Obama has have nothing to do with the issues, it has to do with superfluous characteristics that the right participated in as well.

"""As for your comment regarding the "race" issue-- race will stop being an issue when Obama stops using terms like "my black father," "my white grandma," etc."""

This is what you posted on my wall. Obama is simply talking about his upbringing, the fact that you are offended by his "black father" and his "white mother," says more about your insecurities regarding race than about Obama playing the race card. Again, your arguments are weak. Look at the issues and oppose based on what matters- THE ISSUES-. Not because he informed the country about the race of his parents.

Cassie: said...

So, you're claiming that I'm a hypocrite because Bush kind of exhibited some of the qualities that Obama currently and flagrantly exhibits in his campaign for the '08 presidency. You say the negatives I claim regarding Obama have nothing to do with the issues, and rather, it has everything to do with the issues that both the right and left exhibit.

Well, let me stop you there. It's my post. I'm not attacking the right. Obama is a fool, and it has everything to do with the issues, namely, the ones I laid out, such as his connections to Hamas, his disregard for innocent life, and flamboyant cat calls for regulations and socialist ideals.

Further, I'm not offended by his "black father" and his "white grandmother." I just think that he is being hypocritical when he himself says that is above race, and then he uses it when it's convenient to say things like "stereotypical white person" and then tries to garner some sort of sympathy by addressing his "black father." His grandma is still his grandma, and his father is still his father, regardless of what color their skin is. The only reason he tags their color on them is to use the imagery to make him out to be some sort of a victim. Like people who went to Harvard are any sort of victims. And don't try to say that he was doing it to inform the country of his race, any fool can figure that out just by looking at him.

Now let me just sytematically tear apart the arguments in your original comment, starting after the draw.

Obama is to Hamas as Bush is to bin Laden in the 80's and 90s: horrible analogy. Back then, we didn't know that aiding Iraq in fighting Iran (who just converted to Islamic fascism, by the way) was a bad idea. Lesson learned--unless your Obama, in which case, in 2008, you're still dealing a lot of the people that screwed us over in the 80s and 90s.

Appeasement: In the context Bush was using it in, he basically said that since Ahmedinejad wants to talk, Obama would be willing to talk to him just to make him "feel warm inside." Appeasement.

Saudi Arabia: Just because terrorists were born there doesn't automatically make the country a terrorist country. Saudi happens to be very compliant with US demands for terrorist information. Regarding Rumsfeld/Saddam, the reason why we were led into war had a lot to do with the outcome of those meetings. They were more like "warning meetings." So if anything, it's just another testament of why we don't bother--it's just a waste of time.

Barack the Communist: an indepth and logical study of communism will show you that communism and socialism are slutty twin sisters. These terms are to be used interchangably. I hope that clarifies that for you.

Katrina victims didn't receive federal aid because it was a state issue, Mr. Constitution. Power to the states should mean responsibility to the states. Further, people should take care of people, because the government sucks at taking care of people. Name one thing the federal government (under any administration) has fixed, and then tell me that you want them involved in an emergency situation as catastrphic as Katrina. Good thing we have good people, churches and charities. American -people- did the best they could do in responding to the hurricane. American people are responsible for each other, not federal regulations and strings. You know who should be blamed even more than the federal government? Hollywood. Chew on that for a minute.

Sexy Einstein said...

I am done with this internet argument with you. You said that Obama mentions his black father to gain sympathy. How is that a sympathetic issue? Maybe you view opposite races as sympathetic figures because you look down at them. You say that McCain is not conservative enough for you which probably means you harbor a deep seeded antipathy towards gay marriage and gay people in general which means you are anti civil rights which makes you a bigot. Plain and simple.

You said we aided Iraq against Iran because of their newfound Islamo-Fascism and we didn’t know that Saddam would become the nut he became. WRONG. Iraq was already a fascist nation. Saddam was already a nut, he had already slaughtered hundreds of thousand of Kurds in the Northern territories of Iraq by the time the Iran conflict came to a head.

Look up the definition to appeasement please. “Feel warm inside,” not so much, that is a blanket or tomato soup, not appeasement. Appeasement is the act of granting concessions- NOT CONVERSATIONS. Once again why is war so important to you lunatics, isn’t the goal to avoid war. It is a lot easier for you to sit at your computer and type away that diplomacy isn’t the answer, but war is, while your country men and women are dying for another war that was illegal and unjust.

The Rumsfeld- Saddam meeting had zero to do with this war. Read a book. Those meeting happened pre-9-11. And 9-11 was the overriding motive for the Iraq war, not Rumsfeld’s meeting with Saddam.

And Saudi Arabia has and still employs the Bin Laden group and still funnels millions to organizations that oppose US views, but they have oil. They have blood on their hands but we chose to ignore them because they are our oil buddies.

Barack Obama and communism…really? A common mistake is to confuse Socialism, the economic system, with Communism, the political system. Communists are "socialist" in the same way that Republicans are "compassionate conservatives". That is, they give lip service to ideals they have no intention of practicing. Apparently you do not know what in-depth or logical study actually means, because you have done none of it. I have no idea why I am arguing about politics or economics with someone that hasn’t even grasped the fundamental definitions of the terms we are using. VERY DUMB.

Conservatives defending George W. Bush are in the same situation as Communists defending Stalin. Stalin was never a "socialist" and Bush was never a "compassionate conservative", but the conservatives just don't want to hear any criticism and will go out of their way to deny facts. Liberals want the decision to be spread out among more people, preferably everyone; conservatives want the decision to be made by as few people as possible, preferably just one.

The government currently sucks at helping people, but the government’s job is to help those that can’t help themselves. Tell me again why Hollywood is to blame. This makes less sense than anything else you have written so far, and that is saying something since you write like you never learned the whole alphabet.

This is Produced by a special Republican-dominated House inquiry, it issues 90 separate findings.
"Our investigation revealed that Katrina was a national failure, an abdication of the most solemn obligation to provide for the common welfare," says the report's summary, seen by the Associated Press.
"At every level - individual, corporate, philanthropic and governmental - we failed to meet the challenge that was Katrina."
Read the whole report, because I have, and show me where Hollywood is at fault. This argument is over because you are just spitting out talking points without any actual knowledge to support you claims. You are a fraud.